74 "restored" 2002 CA

[kk550]

Bay area 1974 2002

Anyone's thoughts?

[/url]http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/cto/3040288257.html

[Robertrob85]

Link doesn't work

Here it is

http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/cto/3040288257.html

[malagalaga]

Looks pretty nice from the CL photos. Price is toward the upper end of the market, but eBay prices have been sky high lately. A lot of us are really reluctant to admit that 02 values are climbing fast.

- White on blue is not generally a more desirable color combo, so that will hurt it a little

- working a/c is a plus if you plan to use it as a daily driver

- speaker cut outs are a shame, but at least you'll get decent sound from the radio!

- 58k on the original engine... I'd be skeptical, although it isn't unheard of. If that is true, it is most likely that the car sat for an extended period (or two), and there are lots of issue that come up when that happens.

-76 must pass smog in California, so they tend to be less desirable in the Golden State.

Best bet is to give it a thorough inspection in person or with a knowledgeable mechanic, but I don't see any obvious red flags.

[LJtii]

The plates suggest the car was first registered in CA after 2000, so it is either from elsewhere or was off the road for a long time.