'73 Touring F/S on Denver C/L

[coloincaalpine RIP 2021]

Let me know if anyone needs a PPI.  dq

 

 

https://denver.craigslist.org/cto/d/denver-1973-bmw-2002-touring/6969827371.html

[jp5Touring]

From fifteen feet that looks like a deal, they need more pics

[JsnPpp]

Wow, from the photos that does indeed look like a deal - especially with new paint, etc. (if thats what the ad means).

 

Nice!

 

Jason

[02Les]

It needed more than a paint job. As the USA side marker lights have been retained I would imagine bodywork may have been kept to a minimum.

 

https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1973-bmw-2002-touring/

[Guest_anonymous]

This car was toast underneath. frame rails, rockers rear towers all rusted through.

@coloincaalpine Danny, ask @dp about this car. It was sitting in the Heatherwood section of Boulder for years. We drove by one day and talked to the owner and I took some pictures I have since deleted. This was before it was listed on BaT.

Edited September 2, 2019 by Guest_anonymous

[JsnPpp]

1 hour ago, 02Les said:

It needed more than a paint job. As the USA side marker lights have been retained I would imagine bodywork may have been kept to a minimum.

 

 

https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1973-bmw-2002-touring/

 

 

Indeed - without photos and receipts of repair would have to assume it is as it was...

 

Jason

[Mike Self]

It's got a squarelight nose so it may be a '74.  Tourings retained the round tail lights even after the front end redesign as the square tail lights wouldn't fit without a lot of rear panel redesigning...

 

The BAT photos tell the whole story...unfortunately. 

 

mike

[02Les]

10 hours ago, mike said:

It's got a squarelight nose so it may be a '74.  Tourings retained the round tail lights even after the front end redesign as the square tail lights wouldn't fit without a lot of rear panel redesigning...

 

The BAT photos tell the whole story...unfortunately. 

 

mike

 

It's had a nose job Mike. It's a June '73 manufacture.